(Written in the light of International Human Rights Day )
To have the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health is an intrinsic human right as recognized in major human rights instruments. Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 states that everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health, and wellbeing of himself and his family. The preamble to the World Health Organization's (WHO) constitution also declares that it is one of the fundamental rights of every human being to enjoy the highest attainable standard of health.

As one of the developing countries in the world, Nepal has a gross national income of US$440 per person and a population of more than 29 million. The quality of life and the health indictors are extremely unsatisfactory in this part of the world. Life expectancy at birth is 66 years. Though significant advances have been made in the improvements of maternal and infant morbidities and mortalities, they are yet to perk up. The maternal mortality ratio is 280 per 100000 live births and the infant mortality rate is 39 per 1000 live births. Poverty implications are widespread leaving many without even basic rights such as access to clean water, sanitation and medical care. Moreover, discrepancies in the availability, access and affordability of basic health care services has contributed to the extensive disparity in the health care indicators. The imbalances and mal-distribution in the various categories of human resources of health stands as major drawback to health service delivery. To secure health for the people in Nepal as a basic human right is therefore a challenging issue to confront.

No doubt, Nepal is an area with stark contrasts in access to health care. Underdeveloped roads and fragile communication links, with remote mountainous terrain, poor infrastructure and lack of sufficient and competent health care personnel, particularly in the western Nepal has been limiting people access to health care. Therefore to dream for the fulfillment of the human rights to health care without significant changes in the current state of health service delivery patterns, technical capacity, medical infrastructures and staff expertise as per the health care demand of the country, would rather be vague and absurd.
Health is a privilege, and in developing countries like ours where particular determinants have constrained the delight of safe and stimulating health care, all the national and international instruments would be of no worth unless these commitments are achieved in realism. The state, humanitarian organizations, I/NGOs, voluntary organizations, professionals and even the general public have the key action to take upon. There is an undeniable fact that the right to the highest attainable standard of health for all cannot be realized overnight. Nevertheless the right to health imposes some obligations of immediate effect, such as non-discrimination, and the necessity that the state at least prepares a national plan for securing the health care rights of the citizen. It furthermore demands the active and informed partaking of individuals and communities in the health decision-making that affects them. The state ought to realize that right to health is something more than a slogan. The right must help to guarantee that health policies assign particular consideration to the vulnerable and marginalized, augment community involvement, and ensure that health interventions strengthen public health systems, and so on.